8 Oct

UCSF to support Warriors' ' brand-new arena job in San Francisco

SAN FRANCISCO — — The Warriors, UCSF and San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee revealed UCSF would officially endorse the arena project after preliminary contracts were reached to address traffic concerns for the UCSF Medical Center in the Objective Bay area.
At least $10 million in revenues from the 18,050-seat arena annually would be utilized to fund traffic mitigations for the life of the arena, pending approval from San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors.
The Warriors also concurred, after months of meeting with the neighborhood, that if traffic problems still persisted, they would cap arena events overlapping with weeknight Giants house games at 12.
UCSF chancellor Sam Hawgood, who had revealed in July that his assistance of the arena project was contingent on issues being addressed, said in a declaration the preliminary agreements “represent a win-win.”.
“We’ve got the procedures in place to keep the community moving, to create sure it works for residents, employees and visitors alike,” Warriors president Rick Welts said in a statement.
Hours earlier at the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce’s Warriors Tip-Off Lunch, Warriors owner Joe Lacob stated, with Lee in the space, that the independently funded arena would be developed “in short order” for the 2018-19 season.
“And it will certainly be one of the greatest arenas worldwide in among the best cities worldwide,” Lacob stated.
The job is facing opposition and hazards of suits from the Objective Bay Alliance, a deep-pocketed organization comprised of present and former UCSF researchers, faculty and stakeholders.
For more on the Warriors, see the Inside the Warriors blog site at www.ibabuzz.com/warriors. Follow Diamond Leung on Twitter at twitter.com/diamond83.
The post UCSF to support Warriors' ' new arena project in San Francisco appeared first on Bay Area Houses.

7 Oct

San Jose looks to future advancement amid failed A'' s stadium project

NoneAn artist’s rendering of the proposed San Jose ballpark, looking east towards the downtown skyline. (Wolff Urban Advancement).
SAN JOSE — — After losing a long and winding legal fight to bring baseball to the heart of downtown, San Jose leaders seem abandoning their mission for an arena and are turning their focus to brand-new advancement prospects in the extremely desired location around the proposed ballpark website.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear San Jose’s last-ditch appeal of its antitrust claims versus Big league Baseball for stalling a strategy to move the Oakland A’s to Silicon Valley. The high court was thought about San Jose’s last hope in requiring the league to permit the A’s to construct a ballpark in downtown San Jose.
The proposed arena would have spanned more than 8 parcels near San Fernando Street and Park Avenue, taking control of the land formerly owned by San Jose’s redevelopment agency, near the area’s biggest transit hub, the Diridon transit station. There are numerous other possibilities for the land, however, which is also close to the city’s arena.
“This is an extremely prime area because of its multi-mobile use with an excellent transport network,” said Richard Keit, the successor company’s handling director.
Last month, designer Trammell Crow announced a significant office, retail and real estate job on 8.3 acres nearby. The task, called #Diridon, calls for a high-tech school, including two office buildings and 325 home systems in a nine-story structure.
Mayor Sam Liccardo said the special area of the proposed ballpark website, specifically its distance to the region’s significant transit center, makes it a gem for development — — with or without the new stadium.”The fantastic news is downtown is rejuvenating at a pace that we haven’t seen in generations without Big league Baseball, and it’s going to remain to renew,” Liccardo stated. “So if anything, I believe this helps us really concentrate on the chances that are squarely in front of us. We’ve got a massive amount of advancement interest, and we’re seeing a genuine boom in the downtown.”.
Former Mayor Chuck Reed, who was in office when the litigation began, agreed the high court’s decision won’t diminish San Jose’s downtown landscape. “Having an arena would have had a huge effect on downtown, but it’s doing quite perfectly without baseball,” Reed said.
In spite of the legal choice Monday, the Oakland A’s still have a multiyear option agreement on the downtown San Jose land up until November 2018, Keit said, meanings that it can’t be sold to anyone else.
“They still have an alternative to acquire the land if they were to proceed with moving the team down right here,” Keit stated. “My guess is Lew (Wolff) is not going to get rid of the option arrangement yet — — up until they understand for sure they have a website in Oakland.”.
Councilman Pierluigi Oliverio disagrees with holding the land for Oakland A’s owner Lew Wolff. The push to bring the A’s to San Jose was a “one-way sales pitch,” Oliverio stated Monday, with Big league Baseball failing to interact with city authorities. The veteran councilman said the land needs to now be put back out to bid.
In addition to constructing a ballpark, the choice agreement enables Wolff to develop a mixed-use advancement with retail and workplace, just like the #Diridon proposition.
“Right now, Lew Wolff has an alternative on this land, and he’s going to think he’s very first in line to establish the building,” Oliverio stated. “Now that baseball is dead, we ought to look at the parcels and zone them for the maximum financial impact for the city.”.
The Diridon website is one of the most underutilized parts of downtown, land use expert Erik Schoennauer stated, however has thriving potential due to the fact that of jobs like a future BART station, high-speed rail and access to the SAP Center, among the busiest sports and entertainment complexes in the nation.
Schoennauer, who represented Trammell Crow in the #Diridon job, stated the arena would have brought an estimated 2.4 million individuals to the city for 81 baseball video games a year. However the financial advantage of having a brand-new retail and office development — — including the estimated 9,000 tasks it brings — — will certainly provide a longer-lasting increase to the regional economy.
“You’ll never have 30,000 individuals at one time,” he stated, “however you’ll have a constant amount of individuals more days of the year.”.
For their part, the A’s are now focusing their efforts on Oakland, having actually held a number of talks with Oakland city authorities and maintained an architecture firm to prepare designs for a new ballpark adjacent to the aging O.Co Coliseum. But the team so far hasn’t sent an official proposition. The city is also talking to the Oakland Raiders about a possible stadium at the website, however the groups have actually suggested they do not think there is enough space or sponsorship dollars for two facilities at that location.
Not everybody has actually given up on San Jose’s baseball dreams. And just as on the planet of sports, some Oakland A’s lovers are still expecting a walk-off crowning achievement in the ninth inning.
“I don’t believe it’s over. We’ve got another inning or 2 to play,” stated Scott Knies, executive director of the San Jose Downtown Association. “We are a city that’s deserving of a Major League franchise.”.
Previous Mayor Reed anticipated the A’s will come knocking on San Jose’s door earlier than later on.
“I believe they’ll fail once again in Oakland as they have sometimes before, and the A’s will be back talking to Mayor Liccardo,” he said. “Now we await Oakland to set out once again, and we’ll still be here.”.
Personnel author Howard Mintz added to this report.
Follow Ramona Giwargis at Twitter.com/ ramonagiwargis or contact her at 408-920-5705.
The post San Jose plannings to future development amid failed A'' s arena job appeared first on Bay Area Homes.

6 Oct

$100M resort prepared for South Tahoe'' s Edgewood golf course

STATELINE, Nev. — — A multimillion-dollar resort will certainly put roots down on the Nevada side of Lake Tahoe’s south shore.
The design for the hotel without any betting centers consists of a health club, dining establishment and conference center. Amongst the planned features is a little public beach surrounding the lake-front greens that has actually hosted the American Century Celebrity Championship televised each July on NBC-TV considering that 1990.
The $100 million-plus price tag includes attending to environmental issues such as energy efficiency, runoff and other water-quality concerns. The resort is scheduled to open in the summer season of 2017.
“Like grand lodges of the American West, we hope it will motivate awe with its views and location,” Chuck Scharer, president/CEO of Edgewood Business, outlined 100 individuals collected Thursday at the Edgewood Tahoe Greens clubhouse.
Edgewood Companies is had by members of the Park family, descendants of pioneer livestocks ranchers who settled at south Tahoe more than a century earlier.
“Our (playing golf) visitors have actually asked us to generate a resort, and we’re constantly trying to find methods to satisfy consumers’ expectations,” Scharer said. “It’s the right time for the company and it’s the correct time for the Tahoe market. We’re hoping our job will certainly be a driver for more financial investment in Tahoe.”.
He stated he received numerous concerns regarding the brand and management of the lodge, but the owners picked their own Edgewood Business with the very same name brand the Park household placed on the golf course when it was integrateded the 1960s.
“The response was evident. We are going to build on 45 years’ credibility and brand equity that is Edgewood Tahoe, the Edgewood group,” Scharer said. “It’s our brand, it’s our team.”.
Initial facilities work has currently begun on the site north of U.S. Highway 50 near the California border. The Tahoe Regional Planning Company, the bi-state entity which manages Tahoe-area advancement, approved the job in 2012.
Hal Cole, mayor of South Lake Tahoe, stated the development might be on the Nevada side, but the Stateline area is “becoming more blurred as tourism grows.” Both sides are wise to work together, he said.
“Edgewood needed to have hotel rooms. We are genuinely one coast,” he said.
The Edgewood resort is “sorely needed” for helping grow the Tahoe basin’s recreational tourist market, Claudia Vecchio informed the Reno Gazette-Journal (http://tinyurl.com/q8qgueh ). Vecchio is director of the Nevada Department of Tourist and Cultural Affairs.
“Pc gaming continues to be the No. 1 factor individuals concern Nevada,” she said. “However we talk increasingly more about entertainment, and this is the perfect property for those travelers we want to bring to Nevada.”.
——— —.
Info from: Reno Gazette-Journal, http://www.rgj.com.
AP-WF-10-03-15 1830GMT.
The post $100M resort prepared for South Tahoe'' s Edgewood greens appeared initially on Bay Area Houses.

5 Oct

San Francisco to double the variety of urine-repelling walls

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — — San Francisco officials say they prepare to double the number of walls repainted with pee-repellent paint since the program to stop individuals from peeing in public locations is working.
Public Works Director Mohammed Nuru informs the San Francisco Chronicle 8 more walls will be painted next week in three of the most problematic communities.
In July, the general public works department repainted nine walls in the Tenderloin, the Objective and South of Market communities.
The surfaces make urine bounce right back onto the shoes and trousers of unwary relief-seekers.
The paint was initially utilized in Hamburg, Germany, where beer enthusiasts typically can’t be troubled to discover a restroom.
Indicators over the walls check out, “Hold it! This wall is not a public bathroom. Kindly respect San Francisco and look for relief in a suitable location.”.
The post San Francisco to double the number of urine-repelling walls appeared first on Bay Area Residences.

4 Oct

Concord mayor met Willie Brown, who has ties to prospective weapons station designer

CONCORD — — Mayor Tim Grayson recently sought political guidance from previous San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, a principal at a mutual fund that does business with a firm vying to manage advancement at the Concord Naval Weapons Station.
Lennar Urban is among 2 companies the City Council is thinking about to lead development of the previous military base. Its rival, Catellus Development Corp., has declared that Lennar and its partners, consisting of Brown, incorrectly lobbied the Concord City board in offense of the negotiating arrangement both firms signed in Might.
Grayson and his project supervisor, Mary Jo Rossi, fulfilled two times with Brown in August, he stated.
“Yes, I have actually talked with Willie Brown about my Assembly race, seeking his recommendations and counsel about my Assembly race,” Grayson said.
Nevertheless, Grayson said he did not discuss Lennar or the weapons station task with Brown, a principal at San Francisco-based investment fund Golden Gate Global, which has lent cash to Lennar for its Hunters Point Shipyard project in San Francisco. Rossi, a regional political consultant who as soon as worked for Brown, organized the conferences, according to Grayson. Brown did not react to a demand for comment.
The revelation follows Grayson returned $16,800 in contributions to his Assembly campaign made by business or people related to Lennar.
Embraced in 2012, the Concord Reuse Job Location Strategy calls for developing to 12,272 housing systems and 6.1 million square feet of commercial area on about 2,300 acres of the former military base. The Navy is expected to start transferring building early next year — — about 1,400 acres to Concord and 2,700 acres to the East Bay Regional Park District.
The council had been arranged recently to talk about selecting Lennar or Catellus as the master developer for the first stage of the multimillion-dollar base task, however postponed the conference to examine Catellus’ claims. The meeting has actually been rescheduled for Oct. 15.
Although the city initially showed the investigation would take several weeks, City Attorney Mark Coon said Friday that the questions, performed by city personnel, was virtually complete. He expected to release a letter early today reacting to Catellus.
All 5 council members said Lennar did not lobby them and several wondered why Catellus waited till the “l lth hour” to raise issues about the choice procedure. In addition, Grayson’s associates stated they thought he had actually done the best thing in returning the project donations once he discovered the money came from Lennar’s partners.
Nevertheless, Catellus President Ted Antenucci said the project contributions and the meetings between Grayson and Brown, whom he thinks works for Lennar, breached the companies’ agreement with the city.
“It simply comes down to, is that lobbying or right? In our opinion it is,” Antenucci stated. “Our company believe that language remained in the document to prevent things like that happening.”.
Lennar Urban President Kofi Bonner has actually maintained that neither the company nor its specialists lobbied or worked out with the city. Although Brown made a discussion when three Concord council members toured Lennar’s task at Hunters Point in San Francisco in the summer season, Bonner said he’s not an employee.
“Previous Mayor Willie Brown is not on Lennar’s payroll nor does he have a consulting agreement with the company,” Bonner said in an e-mail.
Catellus also has asked the city to explain why personnel failed to define which of the 2 firms they preferred, as expected.
City Manager Valerie Barone stated she decided to leave a suggestion out of the staff report because both Catellus and Lennar are extremely certified and the report explains the differences in between the 2 proposals.
“Third, having a personnel recommendation produces its own controversy. If council chooses the same company staff suggests then council has ‘‘ rubber marked’ personnel’s work,” Barone wrote in an e-mail. “If council selects the firm staff didn’t advise, then other allegations occur. I was wanting to prevent creating unnecessary controversy.”.
Catellus’ demand for an examination appears to have actually backfired with at least one council member.
“I do dislike a business coming in and giving me 5 pages of legal BS and whining and threatening and informing me exactly what I can do. This is the individual you want to remain in bed with for Twenty Years?” Councilman Edi Birsan stated. “As far as I’m concerned, Catellus has shot themselves in the foot. I still haven’t comprised my mind, but this did not help Catellus at all.”.
Even if the city clears Lennar of any misbehavior, this whole episode might undermine the general public’s confidence in the stability of the option process.
“Has there been impropriety? There’s a lot stuff out there it’s really hard to make that decision,” said Paul Poston, who resides in the Sun Balcony area neglecting the weapons station building.
“I would hope that there’s not. There is a whole lot riding on this. It’s not just their reputation at stake, it’s the city of Concord’s track record at stake.”.
Lisa P. White covers Concord and Pleasant Hillside. Contact her at 925-943-8011. Follow her at Twitter.com/ lisa_p_white.
The post Concord mayor consulted with Willie Brown, who has ties to prospective weapons station developer appeared initially on Bay Area Homes.

3 Oct

We'' re ba-aack! Shuttered stores return to life for Halloween

PARAMUS, N.J. — — Like something out of a horror tale, an abandoned shop in this northern New Jersey city has come back to life, as a Halloween seller.
Spirit Halloween, a chain of more than 1,150 pop-up stores across the nation, has actually reincarnated the previous Staples shop and filled it with 4,000 costumes and accessories with styles varying from zombies to superheroes and princesses to jail prisoners. And gory screens: a zombie-filled train, an overload surrounded by bloody and screaming animated animals.
Spirit Halloween stuffs a great deal of business into a short time. Its personnel swells from the hundreds to more than 20,000 starting in June. It makes its revenue for the year in less than three months. The Paramus store, which took 6 days to establish, opened Aug. 21 and closes Nov. 1.
“We amount an army operation in terms of the way we mobilize and move items,” says Steven Silverstein, CEO of the Egg Harbor Municipality, New Jersey-based company.
Pop-up shops have actually been around for years, however the trend got a big increase when sellers got the idea of short-term leasings for holidays like Halloween and Christmas. Spirit Halloween was launched in 1983, as the vacation’s focus was developing from youngsters and trick-or-treating to celebrations for individuals of any ages, Silverstein says.
Planning for this Halloween started over a year earlier. For instance, it takes 18 months to design and produce display screens like the train and swamp, which are established in all the Spirit Halloween stores.
Staff members hunt for places throughout the year. Some are uninhabited stores in shopping malls, while others occupy stores shuttered by huge chains. A 2nd Spirit Halloween in Paramus is 5 miles up the roadway in a previous Kmart. High presence is vital; both stores are on Route 17, among New Jersey’s busiest buying boulevards.
Merchandise starts rolling into Spirit Halloween’s warehouses in Might. By the summer, sites have been selected, and by mid-August, the shops are prepped to get the goods. Trucks start arriving, and the places go from bare walls and floors to racks and racks breaking with outfits, devices, props and home decor.
Adults’ interest in continuing or reviving the Halloween fun of their youth has turned the vacation into a big cash maker. Price quotes of what customers invest in Halloween vary extensively, running as high as $11.4 billion on outfits, decorations and sweet in 2014, according to the International Council of Shopping Centers. Spirit Halloween, which is privately possessed, does not reveal its sales figures.
“It has become the nationwide party that everybody takes part in,” Silverstein says.
The post We'' re ba-aack! Shuttered shops return to life for Halloween appeared initially on Bay Area Houses.

2 Oct

Mountain View: $5.8 M considered for seasoned real estate job

MOUNTAIN VIEW — — A City board subcommittee is recommending that the city invest $5.8 million on a project that requires 60 systems of economical real estate on El Camino Real.
The task by the Palo Alto Real estate Corporation, which in April purchased a half-acre site at 1701 W. El Camino Real for $5.2 million, might end up costing as much as $32 million, or $530,000 per studio home, according to city staff.
At the Notification of Funds Available Committee’s conference on Sept. 22, affordable housing task supervisor Vera Gil stated the real estate crunch and need for building workers is increasing the cost of the project.
To fund the job, which is meant to mainly house veterans, the Real estate Corporation plans to make an application for a roughly $4.4 million grant from the state. In addition, the nonprofit organization is anticipated to look for about $16.6 million in federal low-income housing tax credits.
There is lots of competition for the federal credits, and if the Housing Corporation fails to obtain them, Mountain View may be asked to pony up another $7 million, according to Gil.
The Palo Alto City board created the Housing Corporation in 1970 to aid construct affordable real estate in the area. The not-for-profit organization operates 20 properties in Palo Alto.
Email John Orr at jorr@dailynewsgroup.com.
The post Mountain View: $5.8 M eyed for veteran real estate task appeared first on Bay Area Homes.

1 Oct

Milpitas houses leading $1.2 million

Home sales are assembled by CalREsource, an Oakland realty info company. Sale prices are computed from the county transfer tax information shown on the deeds that tape at close of escrow and are released four to 8 weeks after such recording. This details is acquired from public county records and offered to us by California REsource. Neither CalREsource nor this publication is responsible for mistakes or omissions. All questions ought to be addressed to CalREsource@aol.com.
617 Arbor Way — — J. Delacerda to G. Chang, $530,000, 08-31-15 [2 bdms/924 sqft/1992 year built], Previous Sale 07-29-2005, $445,000.
2186 Devon Place — — G. & R. Baltazar to Y. Ngo, $1,210,000, 08-26-15 [4 bdms/2698 sqft/1987 year built], Previous Sale 12-10-2004, $900,000.
1848 Forest Court — — J. Dutta to M. Mishra, $635,000, 08-27-15 [3 bdms/1215 sqft/1965 year developed], Previous Sale 06-14-2010, $345,000.
40 Greentree Method — — H. Wu to P. Li,$888,000, 08-27-15 [5 bdms/2140 sqft/1970 year constructed], Previous Sale 02-10-2003, $472,500.
1079 Hermina Street — — Briones Trust to S. & & M. Viswanadham, $890,500, 08-28-15 [3 bdms/1553 sqft/1977 year constructed], Previous Sale 10-26-1992, $230,000.
746 Jennifer Way — — P. Subramanya to R. Karkutla, $710,000, 08-26-15 [2 bdms/1350 sqft/1984 year developed], Previous Sale 07-23-2012, $369,000.
212 Lonetree Court — — J. Yu to A. Athsani, $681,000, 08-26-15 [3 bdms/1240 sqft/1967 year built], Previous Sale 05-28-2010, $340,000.
643 Murphy Ranch Road — — Ora Murphy Cattle ranch 285 to V. Anantharaman, $865,000, 08-31-15 [4 bdms/1676 sqft/2013 year built] 261 North Abbott Avenue — — T. Pa to S. Pan,$450,000, 08-27-15 [3 bdms/1496 sqft/1958 year built], Previous Sale 07-12-1991, $200,000.
101 Parc Place Drive — — T. Ozaki to K. Ozaki,$685,000, 08-31-15 [3 bdms/1530 sqft/2005 year developed], Previous Sale 01-29-2014, $535,000.
238 South Park Victoria Drive — — Guerrero Trust to SVDE II Limited, $725,000, 08-27-15 [3 bdms/1517 sqft/1966 year constructed] BERRYESSA.
2472 Amaryl Drive — — S. & F. Hirata to S. Li,$1,130,000, 08-28-15 [5 bdms/2231 sqft/1997 year constructed], Previous Sale 07-26-2002, $680,000.
2548 Baton Rouge Drive — — Z. Qian to V. Goyal, $709,000, 08-31-15 [3 bdms/1669 sqft/2005 year constructed], Previous Sale 06-06-2013, $515,000.
1790 Bethany Opportunity — — Bay House Conservation Service to E. Tsoi, $982,500, 08-28-15 [3 bdms/1838 sqft/1976 year built], Previous Sale 07-29-2011, $545,000.
3043 Crystal Creek Drive — — L. Ngo to Y. Zhang, $784,000, 08-27-15 [3 bdms/1483 sqft/1985 year built], Previous Sale 03-02-1999, $305,000.
2771 Middleborough Circle — — H. King to Y. Ding, $915,000, 08-28-15 [5 bdms/2500 sqft/1977 year developed], Previous Sale 05-24-1978, $113,400.
2043 Nola Cattle ranch Method — — Pulte The home of J. Boorugu, $686,500, 08-28-15.
88 North Jackson Avenue # 221 — — B. Lincoln to G. & & L. Chau, $415,000, 08-27-15 [2 bdms/1056 sqft/2006 year constructed], Previous Sale 01-07-2010, $316,000.
2062 Ojo De Agua Court — — R. Castillano to Palomino Enterprises, $255,000, 08-28-15 [2 bdms/1000 sqft/1977 year constructed] 2272 Piedmont Road #A — — T. Taylor to M. Su, $520,000, 08-31-15 [3 bdms/1130 sqft/1970 year built], Previous Sale 10-29-2004, $368,000.
131 Puerto Golfito Court — — P. Dao to A. Alcantara, $410,000, 08-31-15 [2 bdms/1000 sqft/1977 year developed], Previous Sale 02-15-2013, $243,000.
1645 Sierraville Avenue — — I. Nepomuceno to J. Mao, $1,050,000, 08-31-15 [3 bdms/2021 sqft/2001 year built] MILPITAS.
AVERAGE SALES RATE: $751,772.73.
AVERAGE SALES RATE: $714,272.73.
The post Milpitas homes top $1.2 million appeared first on Bay Area Homes.

30 Sep

Stanford unveils modified plans for former car row on El Camino Real

MENLO PARK — — Stanford’s strategies to change a defunct auto row on El Camino Real with a mixed-use development now showcase less office and more housing, a modification university officials say was spurred by a failed tally procedure to curb commercial development downtown.
Submitted with the city Monday, a modified proposition for the job at 500 El Camino Real calls for 215 apartments, up from 170, and 145,000 square feet of office, down from 199,000 square feet. A public plaza is still part of the prepare for the about 8.4-acre site.
“We truly heard there’s a huge housing need in the location,” said Steve Elliott, handling director of development for Stanford University. “We’ve been hearing that from all sorts of sources.”.
In 2012, the university proposed building 150 homes and 229,000 square feet of office, which might have been used as medical offices. Those strategies, while certified with the city’s then-new El Camino Real/Downtown Particular Strategy, were modified to reflect community issues that traffic would increase as an outcome of medical workplaces.
Particularly, the university got rid of medical workplaces as a possible usage and cut the amount of office space to 199,000 square feet. The variety of apartments was also enhanced to 170.
The project was postponed when a grassroots group called Save Menlo placed Step M on the November 2014 ballot. Voters peacefully rejected the effort to suppress industrial growth downtown, which Elliott stated the university took as a recognition of the Specific Strategy.
“But we also took to heart a lot of what we heard throughout that Measure M debate and exactly what we heard in relation to our task,” stated Elliott. “In a way, we arrange of started with a clean slate.”.
The revised proposition likewise reflects a major adjustment to the public plaza, called Middle Plaza. A driveway will not cut through the center, making it better for occasions and usage by the companies that will certainly inhabit 10,000 square feet of surrounding ground-floor retail, Elliott said.
Elliott stated members of the public who went to two open houses in May invited the changes to the plaza.
Other tweaks to the plans include moving the majority of the tenant parking underground, Elliott said.
Two more open houses are prepared for November to gather feedback on the revised proposition. The focus this time will be on the architectural design, which Elliot stated is now a mix of mission revival and craftsman contemporary.
“This is not a fully developed project,” he included. “This will be a continuous process as we move forward with the city and the community.”.
But the revised proposition includes enough info for the city to start assessing its possible effects, stated Jean McCown, director of community relations for Stanford University.
“The good news is — — as each of these modifications have actually happened — — the quantity of automobile-related trips has actually been continuously decreasing,” McCown said. “But they still have to take a fresh look at that.”.
Elliott and McCown stated they think younger families and those aiming to downsize will move into the one- and two-bedroom homes, eight which are to be set aside as below market rate per city guidelines.
When it comes to the commercial office space, no one renter is expected to occupy all 145,000 square feet.
“Sand Hill Roadway is an absolute world-class location and this is a block away from completion of Sand Hill Road,” Elliott said. “So, I believe it’s a genuine chance to keep that VC base in Menlo Park.”.
Stanford has possessed the four parcels that form 500 El Camino Real given that 1885. The site was rented to Ford and General Motors in the 1960s, however it has sat mainly uninhabited because 2013.
“The majority of everyone desires something done on those old, abandoned car dealers” Elliott said. “We want to, too. So, we’re working as difficult and as quickly as we can to move that forward. We hope we hear a great deal of great feedback and can act rapidly and put that application forward.”.
Email Jason Green at jgreen@dailynewsgroup.com or call him at 650-391-1337; follow him at twitter.com/jgreendailynews.
IF YOU GOStanford will certainly host 2 open homes at Encinal Primary school, 195 Encinal Ave., on Nov. 5, from 6 to 8 p.m., and on Nov. 7, from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. To find out more, visit www.middleplaza.org.
The post Stanford reveals modified prepare for previous car row on El Camino Real appeared initially on Bay Area Homes.

29 Sep

Concord: Allegation of back space deals thwart marine weapons station choice

Karl Mondon/Bay Area News GroupAn aerial view of the previous Concord Naval Weapons Station
CONCORD — — A month after Mayor Tim Grayson returned project contributions linked to Lennar Urban, a competitor has raised troubling concerns about the integrity of the choice procedure for the Concord Naval Weapons Station designer.
In a highly worded letter to City Manager Valerie Barone, the lawyer for Catellus Development Corp. required that the city investigate whether Lennar and its partners had incorrectly lobbied the City Council in infraction of the negotiating contract both companies signed in May. Catellus also asked why staff failed to suggest a preferred master designer, as expected.
“More notably, individuals of the city of Concord are worthy of that the selection of the master developer, which will certainly have a huge impact on the future of the city, is the outcome of a fair and equitable process untainted by the look of backroom dealings and political impact,” wrote Andew Giacomini, attorney for Catellus, in the Sept. 24 letter.
Adopted in 2012, the Concord Reuse Job Location Strategy calls for building up to 12,272 real estate units and 6.1 million square feet of business space on about 2,300 acres of the previous military base. The Navy is expected to start transferring property early next year — — about 1,400 acres to Concord and 2,700 acres to the East Bay Regional Park District.
The City Council had actually been scheduled on Tuesday to talk about choosing Catellus or Lennar as master designer for the very first stage of the large, multimillion dollar task. The city has actually held off that decision for numerous weeks while it investigates Catellus’ claims.
“The reason that we’re sort of pausing this is making sure we get all the facts clearly laid out for the council and for the community, so that there isn’t any kind of dark cloud hanging over the decision we’re attempting to make,” stated Michael Wright, former executive director of the Regional Reuse Authority who is getting in touch with on the job.
The council, in consultation with Barone, had earlier decided that Tuesday’s personnel report on the comprehensive advancement proposals would include a “balanced representation of the facts,” but no recommendation about which business was best choice, according to Wright.
That decision perplexed Catellus executives, who anticipated personnel would define which of the 2 firms they chose, to help the council make its option.
“We definitely want transparency and, if that lobbying effort resulted in someone being told to pull the recommendation out of the staff report, we believe that’s very significant,” Catellus President Ted Antenucci said.
The letter says that Lennar “may have plans with several prominent regional companies that are likewise lobbying on its behalf.”.
Antenucci said Friday that he had heard that previous San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown met with several council members. Brown, who has ties to Lennar, did make an appearance when the council explored Lennar’s Hunters Point job in the summertime.
Lennar strongly denied any wrongdoing.
“Lennar has not participated in any conversations, settlements or lobbying forbidden under its agreement with the city and has prohibited its experts from doing so,” Lennar Urban President Kofi Bonner said in an email.
“Lennar has full self-confidence that the city has participated in a reasonable and comprehensive process. We are sorry to see that Catellus has actually opted to smear the city of Concord in a noticeable last-minute desperate act focuseded on screwing up the choice process,” Bonner said.
Catellus became worried last month when they got a tip from a Concord homeowner that a few of Grayson’s Assembly project donors were linked to Lennar. Grayson returned contributions completing $12,600 to Lennar’s public relations company, an engineering company that belongs to Lennar’s weapons station group and the president of a San Francisco-based mutual fund that has lent cash to Lennar for its Hunters Point Shipyard project in San Francisco. Each donor gave Grayson $4,200, the maximum allowable contribution to prospects for the Legislature.
Grayson likewise returned Scarborough Insurance Firm’s $4,200 contribution, despite the fact that Lennar rejected having a relationship with the company.
“If they have concerns that there’s a member of the council that’s been lobbied, that concern has to be checked out,” Grayson said. “Nevertheless, anyone can base complaints on presumptions.”.
Lisa P. White covers Concord and Pleasant Hill. Contact her at 925-943-8011. Follow her at Twitter.com/ lisa_p_white.
The post Concord: Complaint of back space deals hinder naval weapons station decision appeared first on Bay Area Houses.